{"id":335,"date":"2024-05-13T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-05-13T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cherylroll.com\/unpopular-seo-opinions-consider-440389\/"},"modified":"2024-05-13T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-05-13T13:00:00","slug":"unpopular-seo-opinions-consider-440389","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cherylroll.com\/unpopular-seo-opinions-consider-440389\/","title":{"rendered":"6 unpopular SEO opinions you need to consider"},"content":{"rendered":"
It seems like the search algorithm changes have been hitting harder than a Taylor Swift breakup song. <\/p>\n
There’s been much talk about core updates<\/a>, helpful content<\/a>, reputation abuse<\/a>, etc. OpenAI is building a search engine<\/a>, and Google’s Search Generative Experience is likely expanding<\/a> soon. <\/p>\n It’s getting hard to keep up, and many SEOs are having some serious FOMO.<\/p>\n With all that discussion, one can’t help but notice some recurring themes. Search engines are clearly evolving (very fast), but it seems like neither our mental models of search engines nor our philosophy of SEO have evolved as quickly.<\/p>\n Whenever a new change happens, I first try to understand what the search engines are doing and why they’re trying to accomplish it. This can be hard, as it’s often the opposite mind view of a site owner or business.<\/p>\n I’ve been playing the role of the contrarian a lot lately, and I’d like to share some unpopular opinions that I think could help many businesses – even if they are a bit hard to swallow.<\/p>\n With every algorithm and change, we move further away from the old days of tricking the search engines and closer to having to do real marketing. <\/p>\n If you aren’t thinking about user needs, personas and intent, you’re already failing.<\/p>\n Too often, I meet with SEOs and businesses whose approach is backward. They start off saying, “I have this thing. Make it rank for this keyword.” <\/p>\n That’s the wrong approach. <\/p>\n A better approach is to start with the keyword, understand the user intent and what they would find useful – and then go build that.<\/p>\n Every SEO – even the whitehats who won’t admit it publicly – dabbles in spammy tactics and what some call “programmatic SEO<\/a>.” <\/p>\n Most have test sites and side hustle sites. We’re all pushing the limits of search engines to see what works and what doesn’t.<\/p>\n That doesn’t mean those tactics are a good business model. They come with risks. <\/p>\n If you’re doing a small affiliate site that you can easily throw away and restart later, that risk might be worth it. If you’re a business with employees who have families to feed – you probably shouldn’t be taking that risk. <\/p>\n It’s not a level playing ground. Search engines are not a public utility and their rankings do not have to be fair and balanced. <\/p>\n Legally, their rankings are still that search engine’s editorial opinion. A search engine’s responsibility is to its users. If the users aren’t happy, they won’t use the search engine (or click the ads!) anymore. <\/p>\n Too often, people are quick to complain about Google and Bing having a “brand bias,” but they wouldn’t have that bias if their users didn’t. <\/p>\n1. SEO is real marketing now<\/h2>\n
2. Spam\/tricks aren’t a business model<\/h2>\n
3. Search engines don’t owe you traffic<\/h2>\n